Belgium minor first to be granted euthanasia

Belgium is the only country that permits euthanasia without age restrictions
Belgium is the only country that permits euthanasia without age restrictions

A terminally-ill minor has become the first to be helped to die in Belgium since age restrictions on euthanasia requests were removed two years ago, officials say.

The head of the federal euthanasia commission confirmed the case but gave no further details.

Belgium is the only country that allows minors of any age to choose euthanasia.

They must have rational decision-making capacity and be in the final stages of a terminal illness.

The parents of the under-18 year olds must also give their consent.

“Fortunately there are very few children who are considered [for euthanasia] but that does not mean we should refuse them the right to a dignified death,” Wim Distelmans of the federal euthanasia committee told the Het Nieuwsblad newspaper.

He told Reuters news agency the case had been reported to his committee by a local doctor last week.

The case occurred in Flemish-speaking Belgium, reports RTBF (in French), the public broadcaster for Belgium’s French-speaking community.

The age of the minor has not been reported.

The Netherlands also allows euthanasia for minors, but they must be aged over 12 years old.

Belgium lifted the age restrictions in 2014. The law passed by parliament said the child would have to be terminally ill, face “unbearable physical suffering” and make repeated requests to die before euthanasia is considered.

Many people, including church leaders and some paediatricians, questioned whether children would be able to make such a difficult choice.

Belgian Paralympian Marieke Vervoort, who suffers from an incurable degenerative muscle disease, says she will choose euthanasia, but not yet.
Belgian Paralympian Marieke Vervoort, who suffers from an incurable degenerative muscle disease, says she will choose euthanasia, but not yet.

Where is assisted dying permitted?

  • The Netherlands, Belgium and Luxembourg permit euthanasia and assisted suicide
  • Switzerland permits assisted suicide if the person assisting acts unselfishly
  • Colombia permits euthanasia
  • California last year joined the US states of Oregon, Washington, Vermont and Montana in permitting assisted dying
  • Canada passed laws allowing doctor-assisted dying in June of this year

How old must the patient be?

Only the Netherlands and Belgium permit euthanasia for patients under the age of 18.

In the Netherlands, a competent patient between the ages of 16 and 18 may request euthanasia or assisted suicide. The parent or guardian does not have a veto, but must be consulted. Competent patients aged between 12 and 16 may also qualify, but only if their parent or guardian consents.

In Belgium, a competent patient under the age of 18 may request euthanasia with parental consent. Additional scrutiny of the child’s competence is required, and suffering based on a psychiatric disorder is excluded.

How many people take this option?

The rate of euthanasia in the Netherlands has remained fairly stable at 2.8% of all deaths (in 2010), according to Penney Lewis, Professor of Law at King’s College London.

The most recent survey of doctors in the UK was in 2007-08. The rate of euthanasia was reported to be 0.21% of all deaths, and a similar rate has been reported in France (in 2009), even though euthanasia remains illegal in both countries.

In contrast, research carried out in Flanders, Belgium found the rate prior to legalisation was unclear, with separate surveys reporting rates of 0.3% of all deaths in the region (in 2001-02) and 1.1% (in 1998). The rate has risen steadily since legalisation in 2002 to 4.6% of all deaths in the most recent survey in 2013.

What do the different terms mean?

Euthanasia is an intervention undertaken with the intention of ending a life to relieve suffering, for example a lethal injection administered by a doctor

Assisted suicide is any act that intentionally helps another person kill themselves, for example by providing them with the means to do so, most commonly by prescribing a lethal medication

Assisted dying is usually used in the US and the UK to mean assisted suicide for the terminally ill only, as for example in the Assisted Dying Bills recently debated in the UK

Complete Article HERE!

Take control over the end of your life: what you need to know about advance care directives

By Nola Ries

Take control over the end of your life: what you need to know about advance care directives.
Take control over the end of your life: what you need to know about advance care directives.

Many agree on the factors contributing to a good death. People want to be treated with dignity, have relief from pain and, as much as possible, to control what happens to them.

Advance care planning is one way to exercise control. The process involves discussing and expressing preferences about the kind of care you would or would not want in a situation where you lack the mental capacity to make decisions.

As part of this process, you can write an advance care directive – a document that can be legally binding. It states your views and instructions about health care and other personal matters.

You can also appoint someone you trust to be you health care decision-maker. Despite its usefulness, only a small number of Australians (around 14%) currently have an advance care directive.

Why have a directive?

Studies show at least one-third of patients receive non-beneficial treatments at the end of their life, including tube-feeding and surgical procedures when there is little hope of the patient getting better. This is despite many older Australians saying they do not want medical interventions to keep them alive when their quality of life is poor.

With a good advance care directive in place, people are more likely to have their wishes for care respected. People with a directive are also more likely to experience fewer unwanted medical interventions, less likely to be moved from their home or community care to a hospital, and less likely to die in a hospital.

a-directive
A directive means you can tell people your health care wishes so your choices can be legally respected.

If a patient who doesn’t have a directive is seriously ill and unable to communicate, doctors will consult with family or others close to the patient about their care. Family members and caregivers often experience stress and guilt when making decisions for a loved one at the end of their life. These decisions are made easier if they are guided by the values and preferences expressed in an advance care directive.

Are directives legally binding?

In Australia, the legal context for advance care planning is complicated as every state and territory has its own laws, but they have common principles. For instance, each law respects the right of an adult who has mental capacity to plan in advance for their health care.

There are two kinds of directives: statutory and common law. A statutory directive means the person completes a document that meets specific government requirements – such as this one in South Australia or this one in Queensland. This week, the Victorian government introduced a bill to parliament to make advanced care directives legally enforceable.

New South Wales and Tasmania don’t have statutes that create forms for advance care directives, but people can make common law directives. This means they can state their health care wishes in their own way and they can be legally respected.

In 2009, the NSW Supreme Court ruled that a hospital had to follow the medical instructions a man had recorded in worksheets. The man was hospitalised with serious illness, lost consciousness and went into kidney failure. The court said the hospital had to respect the written instructions that refused blood transfusions and dialysis.

States that have statutory advance directives may also allow a person to make a common law directive. So it is not always necessary to use a government form. People interested in making an advance directive or appointing a health-care decision-maker should look up the rules in their state or territory; there are some good websites with accurate information.

What’s in a directive?

People often think of an advance care directive as a document that refuses consent to specific treatments. For example, you can specify you don’t want CPR or tube-feeding if you have a life-threatening medical problem with little chance of recovery.

This is true. But directives can also be used to document your values, say what quality of life means to you and specify if you have spiritual or lifestyle beliefs you want respected. For instance, you can write down things that would help create a home-like environment if you have to be cared for in a facility, such as music you would like to listen to or treasured items you would like in your room.

A person might complete an official statutory form to appoint someone as their health-care decision-maker, then attach a statement of values.

A statement of values, wishes and preferences can be helpful for appointed decision-makers and for care providers. Websites such as My Values can help you consider issues about medical care and dying you may not have thought about before.

What else do I need to know?

You are encouraged to review your advance care directive, and other legal documents, to make sure they are up-to-date and reflect your current wishes and instructions.

It is also vital to share your directive with your health-care providers, appointed decision-maker (if you have one), family members and other loved ones who may be called on to help make decisions. Doctors cannot follow a directive if they don’t know it exists.

There is no mandatory central registry in Australia to make sure doctors have access to directives when needed. But people with an electronic health record – known as My Health Record – can include their advance care directive information there.

Advance care planning is typically promoted in health-care settings. But some people are more likely to talk to a lawyer than a doctor about their health wishes. This often happens when a person seeks legal help on other aspects of future planning, such as writing a will or appointing a financial decision maker.

I have argued that legal and health professions can work together more effectively to help their clients plan for their future health care. Doing so promotes their clients’ interests and autonomy. It makes sure people’s values and wishes are known, even beyond a time when they can no longer speak for themselves.

Complete Article HERE!

The condolences end. Being a widow doesn’t.

The second year without my husband is in some ways harder than the first.

By Lisa Kolb

being-a-widow

On the morning of my third wedding anniversary last Tuesday, or more accurately, the third time I celebrated my first anniversary, I awoke still hugging my husband Erik’s dark green Patagonia fleece. It was his favorite, the one he’s wearing in the photo we used for his memorial service program. I hadn’t needed to sleep with it in a while, but I did that night.

I lay there amid my luxurious new bedding, which, along with my new apartment, was supposed to make his absence feel less acute, since he was never associated with it. I listened to the uncomfortable hum of complete silence, but was too conscious of the day’s significance to go through my normal routine of blasting NPR in the bedroom and the TV in the living room to cut the quiet. I began to cry.

My husband Erik died at age 34 last May, along with five other young men, in a rockfall and avalanche on Mount Rainier. We were married for 19 months.lisa-wedding-228x300

I talked myself through the motions of breakfast and getting dressed. I wrote out an anniversary card with nowhere to send it, and walked to the old apartment building we shared in Woodley Park back when he was getting his MBA. I sat alone in the shabby linoleum foyer, on top of someone’s Amazon Pantry delivery box, and let memories flood in. I cried some more.

The day ended disastrously, despite the spa treatments and nice dinner with my mom that I thought might shore up the day from being wholly awful. I was upset at the server for bumping into my chair. I was upset that my mother was my dinner partner instead of my husband. I was upset that only a few people had acknowledged the day.

Year One of widowhood, the year when the grief is obvious and raw and ugly, gets all the support and attention. But Year Two is just as hard, and in some ways, it is lonelier.

In the first year, people check in constantly. They call, text, bring food, plan girls’ weekends and excuse — even support — the shuffling around in pajamas crying each day as we wait for the black, hollow feeling to lift.

The Year Two widow, however, is comparatively abandoned to the continued reality of a new and unfamiliar life. We are among the “walking wounded,” those largely without outward signs of trauma (weight regained, estate settled, tears more easily stifled) but who are still under equal, if different, strain.

I had an idea that passing the one-year mark meant the hard part was over, like crossing the finish line of a particularly grueling marathon, or getting to the front of the line at Target on a Saturday. But it is not over.

The one-year anniversary of a spouse’s death is not a benchmark for being healed. It’s merely the day after day 364, followed by 366, 367 and so on. For widows, anticipating relief upon the one-year mark is to be lulled, then hoodwinked, by a false target that implies to others, and even us, that we must be out of the woods, and thus less in need of continued support.

Year One is a struggle merely to eat, merely to get dressed in the morning, merely to think straight while confronting a crushing list of knife-twisting administrative to-dos, like car title transfers and insurance claims and endless calls to robotic customer service reps to tell them to cancel your husband’s account/subscription/delivery because he is dead.

By Year Two, those things are largely resolved. No small feat, yet it is all replaced by an equally daunting, though less obvious, list of second year to-dos, like learning to live with a new, solo identity after years of partnership. Like knowing that other people must think you should be functioning and working at a back-to-normal level again, and being ashamed and frustrated that you are just not. Like facing the immutable truth that he is still — still! — gone, always will be, and there is nothing you can do about it.

In other words, if Year One of widowhood is a struggle for survival, Year Two is the equally difficult struggle to begin living life again. It is hard. Our spouses just keep being dead.

Some days I do not care about anything. Some days, I am tired — tired of fighting my way forward, tired of feeling untethered, tired of not knowing how to configure the printer, tired of figuring out all the finances, tired of needing the television on, tired of taking the trash out myself, tired of still having to cancel his mail, tired of everyone else having a spouse, tired of missing Erik. Just tired.

Sometimes I’m ambushed by the sight of someone who looks like Erik.  It happened most recently on a sunny afternoon last month. I was walking down Connecticut Avenue to pick up allergy medicine at CVS, debating a detour into Krispy Kreme, when I caught sight of a man walking across Dupont Circle. He had Erik’s same lanky build, sandy blond hair and preppy style, right down to the tailored, pale pink collared shirt. I could not help myself and began following the man down Connecticut, then left onto N Street, sobbing behind my sunglasses, allowing myself the indulgence of imagining, just for a moment, that it was Erik walking around like everyone else, off to work or maybe his CrossFit class. When the man turned the corner onto 17th Street I let him go, realizing that on balance, it was probably less unhealthy to eat a donut than chase a ghost.

Bedtime alone is still hard. When I awaken in the middle of the night in a lonely panic, I listen to audiobooks or watch Netflix despite my and Erik’s strict no-devices-in-bed policy until my mind drifts to the story and away from my endless loop of “what will I do with the rest of my life … why can’t you be stronger and just go to the bank already to close his account … don’t forget to send Erik’s grandfather his baseball hat …”

It is a common refrain among widows that support tends to fall way off after a year. I wish more friends and family would reach out like they did early on. One friend used to send texts containing nothing more than emoji hearts, but it was enough. Some sent me articles or books they thought might help; others called to take me to lunch or dinner. Eating across from an empty chair — and knowing the reason for the empty chair — is difficult. Always initiating plans is tiring.

I want someone to really ask how I am doing, and say Erik’s name or talk about him freely. It keeps him alive. I know people are trying not to upset me by bringing him up, but I promise, he is already on my mind.

I do not blame my friends for their increased absence. Supporting a grieving friend long term requires time and stamina — intangibles already in short supply. There’s an emotional limit, as friends and family look to return to the safety of equilibrium. There’s also an intellectual limit: How could others understand the breadth of such a loss unless they have gone through it? Spousal grief is like Vegas: One must experience it personally to really understand how huge and overwhelming it is.

Some things are better, though. I regained the 10 pounds I dropped when Erik died and I could not eat. I feel strong enough to take ballet class again, after months of being too weak and sad to exercise. I socialize more readily. I laugh. I still cry, but the tears fall days apart, rather than hours; I no longer feel the need to add tissues to my wallet/keys/phone/lip balm check before I leave the house. I was able to clear out some — though not all — of Erik’s drawers. I have found some peace, and learned to accept the loss.

I am now dating Brodie, a widower. Uncannily, Brodie’s wife’s memorial service was on the same day as Erik’s, so what began as a supportive friendship through a shared timeline of grief has blossomed into something happy and wholly our own. But there are complications. I worry that he, too, could suddenly die young — perhaps an accident or fluke heart attack — and must give myself a pep talk every time he takes a flight, goes mountain biking or does not call or text immediately at an appointed hour.

I initially told no one we were dating. I am still sometimes reluctant to tell people, out of fear that they’ll think I no longer need support. I am afraid of being judged: Maybe it’s too soon, maybe people will think I am “over” Erik, maybe people will stop talking about him. But I will never be “over” Erik. Widowhood is sort of like being an amputee: Over time, the wound heals over, and I will learn to function well without my missing limb, but there will always be a vital part of me missing.

Later this evening, I will eat dinner alone and go to ballet class. I will go not because I am particularly in the mood, but because I know a step forward begins with a step out the door. I will go because Erik would want me to go and I want to be okay again — for him, for me, for Brodie, for my family. I am still rusty after not dancing for such a long time; my pliés are shallow and my pirouettes are off balance. But I am dancing again, and striving to get better every day.

The widow’s journey is a complicated and lengthy one. Awareness of that length — by us and by others — helps make it survivable. By acknowledging the loss’ enormity, we can forgive ourselves for continued stumbles and setbacks. I hope our family and friends can likewise know to be there to help us rise.

As I walk to my car after class, I will look up to the night sky and I will tell him, as I often do, “I am trying my very best, love.”

Complete Article HERE!

Doctors ‘routinely wrong’ with predictions for when terminally ill will die

Doctors often get it wrong when predicting how long terminally ill people have left to live, new research suggests.

A review of more than 4,600 medical notes where doctors predicted survival showed a wide variation in errors, ranging from an underestimate of 86 days to an overestimate of 93 days.

And it does not appear that more experienced or older doctors are any better at predicting when somebody will die than their younger counterparts.

Doctors' estimates of when terminally ill patients would die were sometimes out by up to three months, researchers found
Doctors’ estimates of when terminally ill patients would die were sometimes out by up to three months, researchers found

he review of existing research on the subject was carried out by a team at the Marie Curie Palliative Care Research Department at University College London (UCL).

Further work is now being carried out to see if it may be possible to train doctors to make better predictions.

Paddy Stone, professor of palliative and end-of-life care at the research department, said: “Delivering the most appropriate care and treatments for those with terminal illnesses is often dependent on doctors making an accurate prognosis.

“Knowing how much time is left can also better equip patients and their carers to make more informed choices about their care. This research suggests that there is no simple way to identify which doctors are better at predicting survival.

“Being more senior or more experienced does not necessarily make one a better prognosticator but we now want to see if we can identify how and why some doctors are better at predicting survival than others and to determine if this is a skill that can be taught.”

Stephanie Aiken, deputy director of nursing for the Royal College of Nursing (RCN), said: “For a dying person and their loved ones, uncertainty can make a very distressing time much harder to deal with.

“Just as when we are born, the precise timing of death can be an inexact science – but nurses looking after people at the end of their lives recognise the positive impact of being as open as possible about what is observed, even if definitive answers can’t be given.

“As a society we have become much better at speaking about death and dying, and respecting and understanding people’s wishes at the end of their lives.

“But there is clearly more to do to improve recognition of the signs that someone is dying, and supporting families with information.”

Janice Jones, whose father, Stephen Flint, died in 2011 from bile duct cancer, said: “We weren’t given an accurate timescale. The doctor was very non-committal. While some people would prefer not to know, having an idea of how much time dad had left would have made us feel more in control of the situation.

“What hurt the most was that the doctor had seen dad just before the evening that he died and hadn’t given us any indication that it would be so soon.

“Knowing would have allowed us to fill our last days with memories rather than get so bogged down in the routine responsibilities of caring for someone who is dying.”

Complete Article HERE!

Bereavement Practices of Growing U.S. Latino Population Have Been Ignored Too Long, Study Finds

‘The funeral industry wants to serve this community, but it doesn’t know how,’ Baylor researcher says

latino-bereavement-practices
latino-bereavement-practices

By Terry Goodrich

Death research in the United States mostly overlooks bereavement customs of those who are not Anglo-Protestants, says a Baylor University researcher. She hopes to correct that — beginning with a study of Catholic Latino communities, who often hold overnight wakes and present food to the deceased.

Candi K. Cann, Ph.D., who teaches courses on death and dying, took a group of her students in 2015 to a Latino funeral home in a Central Texas city in which nearly 30 percent of the total population identifies as Hispanic or Latino, according to U.S. Census statistics.

“My students — nearly all Anglo — were fascinated,” said Cann, assistant professor in Baylor Interdisciplinary Core of the Honors College. While the Latino population is burgeoning, “this world was entirely foreign to them. The idea of eating and serving food at a wake was one that my students found not only foreign, but repelling, and they couldn’t imagine eating in the presence of the dead.

“I realized that these practices reflect a central part of Latina/o identity formation, yet seem invisible to many, because the death industry in the United States remains so segregated.”

But change is coming, Cann predicts. Hispanics are the country’s largest minority — approximately 17 percent of the population — and expected to double to 106 million residents in 2050, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Funeral directors are seeing a need to expand their services, she said.

Cann’s study — “Contemporary Death Practices in the Catholic Latina/o Community” — is published in the journal Thanatos. At the request of the Funeral Service Academy, a national education organization for funeral directors and embalmers, she has prepared training modules about Latino grieving and funeral practices.

The hallmark of the Latino funeral is the extended wake, which often lasts overnight, Cann said. Mourners bring their children with them, and it is common for families to set up card tables so that they can play dominoes and other games and exchange stories about the deceased loved one. Flowers and candles are placed near the body when the visitation begins.

“The wake is not a quiet affair, but often loud and emotional,” Cann said. “Generally, from the time the deceased is brought to the funeral home, the person is not left on his or her own.” Family members often help with washing, dressing and applying makeup to the deceased after they are embalmed, she said.

That is in marked contrast to most modern Anglo practices, in which the body is usually taken from the hospital, or much less frequently, the home, and then prepared by the funeral home, not to be seen again until visitation, Cann said.

In her article, Cann cited a researcher’s previous study quoting two Cuban-American women in Florida — a mother and grandmother — about spending the entire night at a Cuban mortuary, setting up recliners and drinking espresso.

“It’s not like (Anglo) Americans . . . Once the body is there, we would stay with that body until it is buried,” one woman said. When mourners were hungry, “we would go in shifts — like Grandma was going anywhere! But we couldn’t leave her alone. Somebody was always there to keep her company.”

While families sit and eat in the presence of their loved ones, even within the Latino segment of the United States population, those practices vary, Cann said.

Catered services for Mexican-American funerals are likely to include enchiladas, burritos, tacos, rice and beans; at Columbian visitations, empanadas and plantains are common. In funeral homes that are not equipped to offer catering, food will be shared as offerings to the deceased, with others gathering for meals at the church after services or at the deceased’s home after burial, Cann said.

Many U.S. Latinos are Roman Catholic, but even among Protestant Latinos, Catholicism has a cultural influence, Cann said. Each Latin American country tends to favor certain saints, martyrs and icons, and immigrants carry those preferences into the United States and to subsequent generations, Cann said.

Statues and prayer cards with the pictures of these saints are often placed in the room of the deceased, as well as at funerals and anniversary Mass. The cards often display picture of the deceased, with birth and death dates, and a written prayer of intercession.

“These cards are portable and meaningful memorials,” Cann said. “They operate as a sort of souvenir — evidence of the relationship between the bereaved and the deceased and an assertion of the right of the bereaved to grieve.”

But everyday items, as well as religious ones, play a role in Latino funerals, she said. Many family members and friends also purchase caskets that come with memory drawers or insert panels to hold photos, letters, jewelry and keepsakes.

“The casket, candles, pictures, making a plate and offering it to the dead and saying a prayer . . . Those things recognize the deceased person’s role in your life and continuing your bond. But they are also a way of saying, ‘We’ll continue without you,’” Cann said.

In her research, Cann found that while the need for ethnic funeral services is growing, many funeral homes are not familiar with other cultures.

“The industry wants to serve this community, but it doesn’t know how,” she said.

Establishment of ethnic funeral homes with bilingual staff is on the rise, and some traditional funeral homes are actively recruiting bilingual staff, Cann said. Some also are making adjustments so that catered food can be served during wakes.

Cann said that her research is “an introduction. There is much more work to be done. Death practices in the contemporary United States are one of the few remaining places in which ethnic identity is emphasized and even solidified.

“I wanted to at least attempt to counter the myth of death in the United States as uniform and analogous,” Cann said.

Candi Cann is the author of “Virtual Afterlives: Grieving the Dead in the Twenty-First Century.” In her book, she explores how mourning the dead in the 21st century has become a virtual phenomenon, with the dead living on through social media profiles, memorial websites and saved voicemails that can be accessed at any time. Those practices make the physical presence of death secondary to the psychological experience of mourning for many, Cann writes.

Complete Article HERE!

A touching and humorous look at death in ‘Last Rights’

By

001
From left, Sharon Ohrenstein, Ana Maria Larson and Ann Gundersheimer in “Last Rights,” a documentary play about death and dying with dignity at Florida Studio Theatre.

At some point, most of us give at least a little thought to the concept of death, whether our own or a loved one’s. Though we may not want to think about the end of life, it is inevitable, hopefully later rather than sooner.

With a mix of famous quotes, quick sound bites and a few touching stories, the new play “Last Rights” encourages audiences to think and talk about death a lot more. In fact, the point of this original Florida Studio Theatre documentary theater production is to stimulate conversation as part of its ongoing “For the Ages” project exploring issues surrounding aging.

As one character says, we know a lot about the birthing process, but few of us actually know what happens at death. There’s a lot to learn, and you get some lessons in “Last Rights.”

Assembled and directed by Jason Cannon from more than 100 interviews with area residents, including caregivers, hospice workers, journalists and loved ones of those who died, the production is presented in Bowne’s Lab as a reading of sorts. The six cast members stand with scripts in hand ((and)) when it’s their turn ((they)) ((delete-to)) share a story or offer one-line thoughts.

“People breathe much longer than they’re alive,” one man notes, while another says, “If we understood death better, we’d be less afraid.”

002
From left, Michael Kinsey, Mark Konrad and Bob Mowry share stories from area residents in the Florida Studio Theatre production of “Last Rights.”

Considering the subject, the play is surprisingly humorous, as it touches on everything from the many euphemisms for death to famous last words, fear of death, dying with a sense of dignity during treatment for an illness, what we expect after death, grieving, and how survivors learn to move on in their lives.

Three widows complain about how their friends avoid them because they don’t have the words to express their sympathy and other feelings.

Get over it, and call.

The actors generally play recurring characters, like Bob Mowry’s compassionate, well-informed and experienced hospice worker who shares some personal stories and important legal information about patients’ rights to refuse care. Ann Gundersheimer is grounded and moving as a gerentologist ((sp?)) providing insights into aging and death. Mark Konrad plays a man who has one year left to live and wants to make the most of it. (Did the year end before the show ((?)) ((B))ecause the character disappears after a while) Sharon Ohrenstein plays an enthusiastic home health aide and Ana Maria Larson is extremely moving as she talks about taking care of her grandfather((,))who wasn’t ready to give up on life.

Michael Kinsey has the strongest through line as a gay man who shares memories of his late first husband and how they mesh into the life he has with his second. But he worries about what happens in the afterlife. Husband No. 1 told him, “I’ll see you on the other side.” ((W))hat happens when he shows up with husband No. 2 ((?))

The play is divided into five sections over two acts that run longer than needed without more compelling story arcs, like the stories Kinsey shares. There is no real narrative, just groupings of ideas and thoughts built around specific topics. There’s a nicely staged moment at the end of the “Any Last Words” section that ((would have provided ((Delete-provides)) a nice finale to the first act, but there’s still another section to go.

The cast, however, keeps us interested, and the play raises a lot of issues that are certainly of concern to the older FST audience and should be of interest and thought for those decades younger. “Last Rights” does have the ability, in an easily digestible way, to make you consider the possibilities of how you want to go.

Complete Article HERE!

Dying Mother’s Lost Letter To Daughter Is Returned 12 Years After Her Death

By

lost-letter

If Blanche DuBois’ words about the kindness of strangers have ever been truly applicable, that time is now.

A letter written to a 4-year-old girl by her dying mother was found by a kind stranger and returned to the grown woman 12 years later.

Gordon Draper – the owner of Bondgate Books in Bishop Auckland, England – found the letter in a stack of secondhand books. He instantly recognized that it was extremely special.

The letter was folded with an old photograph of a woman with short hair and glasses. She had a young girl on her knee, who was undoubtedly her young child.

lost-letter2

“Bethany (my little treasure),” the letter begins. “If your dad is reading this to you, it is because I have died and gone to heaven to live with the angels.”

The letter goes on to explain,

My chest was very poorly, and I had an operation to make it better, but it didn’t work. I will always be in the sky making sure you are alright and watching over you.

The dying mother tells her daughter that it’s OK to grieve, and that she will always be with her.

I will always love you and don’t let anyone tell you it’s wrong to talk about me because it’s not. I hope you don’t forget me because I’ll always be your mam.

“I’ll always be your mam.”

Draper realized the importance of this letter, and decided that he must return it.

lost-letter

Here’s what the letter said in its entirety:

Bethany (My little treasure)
If your dad is reading this to you It is because I have died and gone to heaven to live with the angels. My chest was very poorly and I had an operation to make it better but it didn’t work. I will always be in the sky making sure you are alright and watching over you.
So when you see a bright star like in the nursery rhyme Twinkle Twinkle Little Star that’s me. Be a good girl and live a long happy life your dad and Granda will look after you and take you to school.
I will always love you and don’t let anyone tell you its wrong to talk about me because its not. I hope you dont forget me because I’ll always me your mam. Lots of hugs and kisses.
Goodbye
Mam
PS I’m depending on you to look after Rosie for me now. Don’t forget her will you not.

Draper wrote into the local newspaper, The Northern Echo. They ran the story on their front page last weekend.

Bethany Gash – who is now 21 years old with a child of her own – was sent the article by a friend. The letter had gotten lost five years after the death of her mother, when the family moved house.

Bethany was overwhelmed.

I thought it could never be found. I really can’t describe it because I never thought that the day would come.

When Bethany and Draper got in contact, he realized that they had already met. Draper had met Bethany’s mother when she had come into his shop to buy books for her young child.

“She was really poorly when she came in, but she bought lots of books for the kiddie who was just a little girl,” he said.

Bethany’s mother had been battling cystic fibrosis. She died in 1999, at just 36 years old.

“She really spoiled her with all the ‘Beatrix Potter’ sets and ‘Paddington Bear’ books, and could not have emphasized more that books meant a lot and she wanted to leave her something,” Draper added.

But after the move, Bethany never expected to see the letter ever again. “The length which these two gentlemen have gone to reunite me with it is just amazing,” she said.

To honor the memory of Bethany’s mother, Draper presented Bethany with a set of “Winnie the Pooh” books for her son, Oliver, just as he had done for her mother more than a decade earlier .

lost-letter3

“It’s so lovely seeing her again,” he said. “She looks like the same little girl I saw in her pram when she was in my shop before.”

Complete Article HERE!