Tag: End of Life Care

Posted on

UK is the best place in the world to die, according to end-of-life care index

Integration of palliative care into NHS and strong hospice movement among reasons for UK ranking first in study of 80 countries

A nurse at a patient’s bedside
A nurse at a patient’s bedside

The UK is the best place in the world in which to die, according to a study comparing end-of-life care in 80 countries.

The integration of palliative care into the NHS, a strong hospice movement largely funded by the charitable sector, specialised staff and deep community engagement are among the reasons cited by the Economist Intelligence Unit(EIU).

The upper echelons of the index are dominated by wealthy European, Asia-Pacific and north American countries. Australia is second, New Zealand third and Ireland and Belgium complete the top five.

Annie Pannelay, of EIU healthcare, said: “A very strong marker in our index is the availability of specialised palliative care workers and this is where the UK scores particularly well. The UK has a long history of providing treatment in palliative care. The other super strong marker is the way that the countries do have a plan for palliative care. That means they are on the dynamic of measuring progress and improving.”

The US is ninth in the index. Taiwan is the highest Asian country, placing sixth, while India and China rank 67th and 71st respectively. Their performances were described as worrying in light of their huge populations, with China of particular concern given that “the impact of the one-child policy, often leaving individuals caring for two parents and four grandparents, will lead to even more demand for outside resources to provide support”.

Among the countries that fare well despite being less wealthy and having less well developed healthcare systems are Mongolia and Panama, 28th and 31st on the index respectively. Mongolia’s performance was attributed to an individual doctor who has driven an increase in palliative care.

Despite the UK’s top ranking, the study’s authors say it is “still not providing adequate services for every citizen”. They highlight an investigation by the parliamentary and health service ombudsman into complaints about end-of-life care, published in May, which raised issues including poor symptom control, poor communication and planning, failures to respond to the needs of the dying, inadequate out-of-hours services and delays in diagnosis and referrals for treatment.

Pannelay said: “There are some concerns but there is a plan to improve and the single fact that there is a parliamentary report on that and it’s available publicly means a lot – that means the UK is working on it.”

The UK received the top score in the indicator measuring financial burden to patients, indicating that 80% to 100% of end-of-life care services are paid for by sources other than the patient, much of it from charitable funding.

The authors praise the Dying Matters Coalition set up by the National Council for Palliative Care charity in the UK to encourage people to talk more openly about death and make plans for the end of life.

The EIU says the UK’s resources, like those of other countries, will be stretched in future by an an ageing population and non-communicable diseases including cancer, dementia and diabetes.

The authors say recent third-party research demonstrates a significant link in the use of palliative care and treatment cost savings. Despite evidence of the economic benefits, they point out that only about 0.2% of the funds awarded for cancer research in the UK in 2010 went to research into palliative care, while in the US it was 1% of the National Cancer Institute’s appropriation.

The Quality of Death Index, commissioned by the Lien Foundation, a Singaporean philanthropic organisation, is based on qualitative and quantitative indicators and took in interviews with more than 120 palliative care experts from around the world.

The UK came top in the only previous index, produced in 2010, although that was limited to 40 countries and the criteria has since been refined.

Complete Article HERE!

Posted on

To Die At Home, It Helps To Have Someone Who Can Take Time Off Work

dying-at-home
Having a loved one take at least two weeks off work increased the likelihood that terminally ill cancer patients could die at home.

By Lynne Shallcross

When a family member of mine was dying of cancer, her husband’s boss told him to take all the time he needed to care for her. She was granted her wish of being at home when she left this earth, surrounded by those she loved most.

But a wide base of support is needed in order for a patient’s wish to die at home to be made real — including, in some cases, whether someone can take time off work to be with their loved one in their final days, a study finds.

Terminally ill cancer patients whose relatives took at least two weeks off work in the three months preceding their death had a greater likelihood of dying at home, compared with patients whose relatives took no more than three days off.

The study, which was published in BMC Medicine on Thursday, looked at the deaths of more than 350 cancer patients in London. Using feedback from those patients’ loved ones, researchers found that four factors could explain 91 percent of deaths that occurred at home: patient’s preference, relative’s preference, home palliative care or district/community nursing.

Having a comprehensive home-care plan in place is crucial, says lead author Barbara Gomes, a research fellow at the Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy & Rehabilitation at King’s College London. That should include specialist palliative care services and the availability of around-the-clock nursing. The number of home doctor visits also increased a patient’s chances of dying at home.

But researchers also identified three factors that had been previously overlooked yet still weighed into whether a patient died at home: the length of time in which the family knew the patient’s illness was incurable; discussion of the patient’s preference with family; and the number of days family members took off work in the three months before the patient’s death.

There are a variety of possible explanations for the connection between relatives’ days off work and a loved one’s at-home death, but Gomes is careful to point out that this retrospective, observational study can’t draw a cause and effect on this point.

Some governments have recognized the importance of being with a loved one who is dying and have set up support programs to better facilitate family caregiving. Gomes points to a compassionate care benefit in Canada, which offers employees a paid employment insurance program if they need to care for a gravely ill loved one.

Only three states have paid family leave policies: California, New Jersey and Rhode Island. Both Washington, D.C., and the state of New York are considering paid family leave legislation, and the FAMILY Act was introduced in Congress this year with the goal of providing a national paid family and medical leave insurance program.

David Bolotsky, founder and CEO of the online marketplace and retailer UncommonGoods, provides his employees at the Brooklyn-based company with paid leave. Not all American workers are so lucky: Every company has a different policy and different leave benefits. Although many workers are eligible for the federal Family and Medical Leave Act to care for a child, parent or spouse with a serious health condition, that leave is unpaid, which can make it financially impossible.

Bolotsky argues for providing paid family leave to all employees, as he did recently in an op-ed in support of the New York bill. “For most of us, nothing is more important than our families,” he says. “The folks who raised us ought to be able to have a dignified passing, and being able to be there with your loved ones is really important.”

The British study also found that dying at home was more peaceful for the patient and led to less grief among their loved ones. And the people who died at home didn’t experience more pain than those who were in a hospital.

Though health care should ideally be patient-centered, Gomes says remembering the crucial role that relatives play in the decision-making process and in the actual caregiving is important.

She recommends that health care providers encourage the patient and loved ones to discuss preferences for where the terminally ill patient will die, as well as acknowledge that preferences may change as time goes on.

Providers should also help the patient and relatives become aware of the medical supports and services available to them, along with explaining that staying at home to die may not be medically feasible.

Complete Article HERE!

Posted on

A nurse with fatal breast cancer says end-of-life discussions saved her life

Amy Berman says discussions with her doctors have been very valuable.

 

By Amy Berman

To: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services:

News reports say you will soon make a final decision about paying doctors and other providers who talk to their patients about end-of-life planning, I have a fatal form of breast cancer, and I’d like to tell you how such conversations have allowed me to survive, and live well, in the five years since my diagnosis.

I am a nurse, a nationally recognized expert in care of the aged and senior program officer at the John A. Hartford Foundation, which is devoted to improving the care of older people in the United States. Yet my perspective is not simply professional. For, you see, I live with Stage 4 (end-stage) inflammatory breast cancer. And while this metastatic cancer will one day kill me, the advanced-care planning conversations I have had with my health-care team have been lifesaving since my diagnosis.

I use the word “lifesaving” advisedly because that is what these conversations are truly about. When done well, they can shape care in ways that give people with serious illness a chance at getting the best life possible.

This kind of conversation initially helped my care team understand what was important to me and helped clarify my goals of care. Faced with an incurable disease and a prognosis where only 11 to 20 percent survive to five years and there is no statistic for 10-year survival because it so rarely happens, I came to understand that my priority was to seek a “Niagara Falls trajectory” — to feel as well as possible for as long as possible, until I quickly go over the precipice. Quality of life is more important to me than quantity of days, if they are miserable days.

Following a discussion with my oncologist (a conversation that would be reimbursed if you in fact move ahead and change your rules), we initially decided on a palliative regime to slow the cancer’s spread with the least amount of burdensome side effects. We would not impose the most difficult curative treatments on an incurable disease.

This treatment has included a pill I take each evening to hold back the hormones that fuel my cancer, coupled with a monthly infusion to keep my bones strong. I don’t take most difficult treatments, the typical noxious cocktail of two chemotherapy drugs that 90 percent of people with inflammatory breast cancer receive, coupled with surgery to remove my breast, followed by weeks of radiation and more debilitating chemotherapy.

When I suggested a second opinion after I was diagnosed, my oncologist blessed it. Sadly, when I sat down with this esteemed expert, he didn’t ask about my goals or wishes. Instead, he suggested an aggressive, hail-Mary treatment regime — including rounds of chemotherapy, a mastectomy and radiation — that would have compromised the quality of my remaining life without any real benefit. There was no conversation. He was expert in everything but what really mattered to me. I thanked him for his time, and left.

[How I decided to live a good life with the time I have left.]

I am pleased to report that the subsequent nearly five years have rewarded my decision to seek palliative rather than more aggressive treatment. The cancer has spread a bit farther from my spine and into a couple of my ribs. But because my treatment focuses on helping me live well and feel well, I haven’t been in the hospital. I feel great. My pain has been minimal so far — with one exception.

Six months ago, the cancer spread to a new spot, my fourth and fifth ribs. It was painful. The standard treatment is 10 to 20 doses of radiation to get rid of the pain. My palliative care provider, an expert in fostering discussions about goals of care, said that a recent recommendation of the Choosing Wisely Campaign, which promotes patient-physician conversations about unnecessary medical tests and procedures, suggested that I could get rid of the pain with a single, larger dose of radiation. It worked like a charm. I felt better, avoided the terrible side effects of repeated radiation, got immediate relief and avoided paying for all the unnecessary doses of radiation.

I estimate I’ve saved about a million dollars by avoiding care I do not want, which includes the cost of chemotherapy, radiation, surgery to remove the breast, at least one hospitalization for that care, and the follow-up care to the surgery. Chemotherapy alone would have cost upward of $500,000. Insurance would have covered much of this, but not all.

Meanwhile, I continue to work full time and have redoubled my efforts to improve the health-care system for older people. And I live a good life with serious illness. I have climbed the Great Wall of China, ridden a camel in the Jordanian desert and water-skied to the Statue of Liberty, and I continue to enjoy time with my family and friends.

So my original advance-care planning discussion has been lifesaving. It has also saved the health-care system a great deal of money.

All people deserve care that meets their emotional and financial needs. Unfortunately, health-care providers, including those paid by Medicare, have not had the incentives, time or training to sit down with people facing a life-threatening illness and discuss what’s important to us as our health deteriorates, things such as where we want to die (I want to be at home), what’s most important (control my pain) and what treatments we want to avoid (I don’t want to be on life support and don’t want to be resuscitated). As a result, our system provides a lot of expensive crisis care as people reach the end of life — care that people, if asked and engaged, might say they never wanted.

[Medicare has a rule that prevents people in hospice care from getting reimbursement for further treatment]

This does not have to happen. High-quality advance-care planning discussions help people like me understand their options and make their wishes known. They can identify a surrogate to make decisions when they are unable to, and they can document their preferences in their medical records. These discussions — which should be ongoing, not just one-time — can revisit decisions in the face of new challenges, and over time they can guide providers to deliver the care that patients and their families want.

The benefits of a rule from Medicare covering such conversations are clear: better health, better care and, in many cases, lower costs. Most important, these conversations will be lifesaving, enabling those of us with serious illness to live the way we want to, fully and deeply for as long as possible.

Thank you for your consideration.

Complete Article HERE!

Posted on

Doula for the dying: Connecting birth and death

BY AMY WRIGHT GLENN

Amy Doula Dying
Daughters of 97-year-old Utah native William Vance Wright hold vigil.

The last time I saw my grandfather, he was 95 years old. He walked with a bent back. Kindness graced his watery eyes.

During dinner, he asked me how old my son was at least four times.

“Is he 2?” he inquired once again.

“Almost. He’s 21 months, Grandpa,” I answered.

He smiled and returned to eating his tilapia, mashed potatoes and squash.

At the end of our visit, I walked him to the car. As we approached the steps leading down to the garage, he mentioned his bad knee – an injury from the war.

“I can do it,” he said, gently refusing my hand. “Just one step at a time.”

As my uncle opened the car door, my grandpa suddenly stopped. He turned back to look at me. He kissed his hand and lifted it up in the air. I blew a kiss back to him. He “caught it,” then brought it to his cheek with a knowing smile.

The last time I saw my grandfather, he blew me a kiss. That is what I remember most.

Doulas and Dying

I am a doula. I am also a hospital chaplain. In holding space for birthing and dying, I’ve come to see one thing clearly. Standing with an open heart in the presence of birth is very much like standing with an open heart in the presence of death.

The word “doula” translates from Greek to mean “woman servant.” Today, doulas are known best for accompanying laboring and/or postpartum women. Doulas offer emotional, mental, spiritual and physical support during the transition of opening to new life. According to a 2013 nationwide survey conducted by Listening to Mothers, around 6 percent of expectant couples in America hire a birth doula. This number is small, but it’s growing. In 2006, only 3 percent of birthing women had doula support.

The vast majority of American women give birth in a hospital. Given this, the compassionate and consistent presence of a doula offers a healing tonic in an impersonal and medicalized obstetrical setting. Doulas focus solely on providing comfort measures, based on best practices, to ease the pain of labor and steady the heart and mind of a birthing woman. As a doula, I offer support for hours on end. I do my best to mirror back to a woman her courage, beauty and strength. Doulas believe in the power of birth and regard the process of birth as sacred.

What happens when we take the doula model described above and apply it to end-of-life care? What if we doula the dying?

Like with birth, the majority of Americans die in a hospital. While the majority of us wish to die at home, according to the National Center for Health Statistics, only 27 percent of Americans do. Most of us are born and die surrounded by medical professionals and beeping machines. Ideally, the technology associated with important medical advancements doesn’t eclipse the perennial needs of the human heart. Women birth best when they feel safe, are supported, and their bodies are allowed to open with organic wisdom. In the same way, the dying are best comforted with human touch, love, story and song.

In 2003, Henry Fersko-Weiss, a licensed clinical social worker, created the first end-of-life doula program in the U.S. He saw that there was “a gap” that hospice and medical professionals couldn’t fill when it came to supporting the dying and the bereaved. He trained with Debra Pascali-Bonaro, creator and director of Orgasmic Birth and chair of the International MotherBaby Childbirth Organization. Fersko-Weiss transferred knowledge gained about birth doula work to caring for the dying. As president of the International End of Life Doula Association (INELDA), he trains hundreds of individuals, drawing upon his studies of the intersectionality of birth and death work. Today, a small but growing number of organizations wisely build upon the doula model and offer training to support the dying and bereaved.

Fersko-Weiss is unique. Few end-of-life care professionals are trained in birth work. Few birth workers are trained in caring for the dying. Yet, uncanny similarities in best practices exist across these professions. At the October 2014 Midwives Alliance of North America annual conference, I spoke about the overlapping skill set taught in both my training as birth doula and hospital chaplain.There is much to be gained from studying what it means to hold space for both birth and death.

Holding Space

“That sure looks like my brother Darcey,” my grandpa said a few days before he died. His eyes gazed across his room. Then, he added, “Hi Mom. Will you stay close to me today?”

Will you stay close to me today?

When the veil between our visual world and the wonders beyond the physical senses thins, we seek out the hands of loved ones. Whether a mother holds these hands as she bears down to push a beloved child into our world, or whether an elderly woman holds the hands of her children as she breathes her last breath — we reach for each other. We do.

Wisdom and insight are born when we stay close to the birthing and dying. Wounds from the past can be healed. Forgiveness and perspective dawn. Our culture is currently fragmented from much of this wisdom. The training of doulas represents a healing shift. By holding compassionate and nonjudgmental space, doulas support families as they make room for the generations to enter and exit this world. As we attend to birth and death, we touch upon a great mystery and deeply benefit from being starkly reminded of our own mortality.

During my grandfather’s final days, his grandchildren and great-grandchildren came to his bedside. While he received quality and attentive hospice support, it was the consistent and compassionate care of his seven children that mattered most. In particular, my Aunt Colleen’s remarkable devotion to her father made it possible for him to live out his final years and eventually take his final breath in the comfort of his own home. She was his doula.

While the birth/postpartum doula movement makes important inroads in our maternity care system, great commitment and insight are needed to bring doula care to the dying. The elderly are easily disregarded in a culture that worships youthfulness, independence and productivity. Like infants, the dying remind us of our fragility, our dependency and our need for each other. When we sequester either birth or death, we lose touch with the truth of our interdependence, the nesting of generations, and what Buddhist teacher Thich Nhat Hanh calls our “interbeing.”

‘Just one step at a time’

As I work to train death doulas, hold space for the birthing and meditate on the mysteries that connect the threshold points of life, I remember my grandfather’s words: “Just one step at a time.” Yes. Just one birth, one death, one step at a time.

Slowly, steadily, the doula movement brings needed healing to how we perceive and experience both birth and death. Holding compassionate presence in our most fragile moments reminds us of what matters most. Certainly, it’s not what we possess. Even the location of birth or death is secondary. It’s the presence of love and the gentleness we bring to our mortal journey that matter most.

The last time I saw my grandfather, he blew me a kiss. I hold it close to my cheek. It inspires me to do this work.

Complete Article HERE!

Posted on

Inmates Help Other Prisoners Face Death in Hospice Program

By Andrew Welsh-huggins

Inmate Scott Abram sings to a fellow inmate who is dying and is spending his last days in a prison hospice program, on Friday, Sept. 11, 2015 in Columbus, Ohio. Abram, serving 15 years to life for murder, is a counselor trained in a national ministry program who sees his volunteer work as part of his own growth. (AP Photo/Andrew Welsh-Huggins)
Inmate Scott Abram sings to a fellow inmate who is dying and is spending his last days in a prison hospice program, on Friday, Sept. 11, 2015 in Columbus, Ohio. Abram, serving 15 years to life for murder, is a counselor trained in a national ministry program who sees his volunteer work as part of his own growth. (AP Photo/Andrew Welsh-Huggins)

As late-morning sun streams through narrow prison windows, convicted killer Scott Abram stands beside a fellow inmate, speaks quietly to him and starts singing “Amazing Grace.” The prisoner appears to smile, but it’s difficult to gauge his response. He is dying.

He passes away two days later in early September.

Abram is a counselor trained in a national ministry program who sees his volunteer work as part of his own growth. Behind bars since the early 1990s for murder, he has gotten used to spending time with male prison friends as they die in rooms 205 or 206 on the second floor of the state’s prison for chronically ill inmates.

“We’re all human, and we make mistakes,” said Abram, sentenced to 15 years to life. “There are some that make bigger mistakes, like me. I make a lot of mistakes each day.”

Abram, 48, is a Stephen Minister, a type of lay counselor common in churches around the country but rarer inside prison walls. He is one of 15 male and female inmates trained in the program at Franklin Medical Center, a small prison just south of downtown Columbus that houses some of the state’s sickest inmates, many of whom die there.

Abram’s hospice work is just part of his Stephen Minister counseling. He and others also work with troubled inmates, perhaps helping them write a letter or make a call.

In Ohio and nationally, the inmate population is graying. Ohio had 8,558 inmates over 50 this year, nearly double the number in 2001. Other states, including Louisiana, Iowa and California, have similar prison programs.

Prisoner Sheila Belknap says her participation also makes her think about her own mistakes. Belknap, 42, plans to continue hospice work after she is released next year from a four-year term for theft charges. She calls her work with the dying a privilege.

A prison official points out a handmade quilt featuring the names of inmates who have died in prison hospice at the Franklin Medical Center, on Friday, Sept. 11, 2015 in Columbus, Ohio. Inmates trained in a counseling program called Stephen Ministries help fellow prisoners in their last days. (AP Photo/Andrew Welsh-Huggins)
A prison official points out a handmade quilt featuring the names of inmates who have died in prison hospice at the Franklin Medical Center, on Friday, Sept. 11, 2015 in Columbus, Ohio. Inmates trained in a counseling program called Stephen Ministries help fellow prisoners in their last days. (AP Photo/Andrew Welsh-Huggins)

“It’s just the satisfaction I get just from being there at the time of need,” she said. “No one wants to pass alone.”

Nos. 205 and 206 — there is also a room in another unit for female patients — resemble ordinary hospital rooms. Hanging wall quilts made by volunteers soften the institutional feel. Abram and Belknap are often joined by members of a Columbus choir that sings to hospice patients around central Ohio.

The Department of Rehabilitation and Correction hopes to expand the number of Stephen Ministers at other prisons, though hospice care would remain in the Columbus facility.

On average, an Ohio inmate dies of natural causes every three and a half days, not unexpected with a statewide prisoner population of 50,000, the size of a small city.

The national Stephen Ministry office in St. Louis is unaware of other state prisons with inmates trained in their counseling program.

Louisiana began an inmate hospice program in 1997 at the state penitentiary in Angola and developed a 40-hour training program for offenders, who volunteer for four-hour shifts with dying prisoners. California says it established the nation’s first inmate hospice at the California Medical Facility in Vacaville in 1993.

Inmate Scott Abram, holding a training dog, Ziva, talks about his work counseling fellow inmates including some who are dying and spending their last days in a prison hospice program, on Friday, Sept. 11, 2015 in Columbus, Ohio. Abram, serving 15 years to life for murder, also trains puppies that may end up as pilot dogs. (AP Photo/Andrew Welsh-Huggins)
Inmate Scott Abram, holding a training dog, Ziva, talks about his work counseling fellow inmates including some who are dying and spending their last days in a prison hospice program, on Friday, Sept. 11, 2015 in Columbus, Ohio. Abram, serving 15 years to life for murder, also trains puppies that may end up as pilot dogs. (AP Photo/Andrew Welsh-Huggins)

The program at the Iowa State Penitentiary in Fort Madison, Iowa, was the subject of “Prison Terminal: The Last Days of Private Jack Hall,” a documentary by filmmaker Edgar Barens that received a 2014 Academy Award nomination.

“It not only helps the prisoner who’s dying of a terminal illness, but it’s so redemptive for prisoners who go through the process of becoming hospice workers,” said Barens, a visiting media specialist at the University of Illinois at Chicago. “It’s tenfold payback when a prison does this.”

Complete Article HERE!

Posted on

California Governor Signs Right-to-Die Bill

By Josh Sanburn

California becomes the fifth state to allow the controversial practice

California Gov. Jerry Brown signed legislation Monday allowing doctors to prescribe life-ending medication to dying patients, making the state the fifth to legalize the practice and the first since the death of Brittany Maynard, whose decision to leave the state to end her life last year lent new urgency to the right-to-die movement.

Brown, a Catholic who at one point considered joining the priesthood, said in a statement that the religious objections to the bill were not enough to convince him to veto it.

“In the end, I was left to reflect on what I would want in the face of my own death,” Brown said in a statement explaining his decision. “I do not know what I would do if I were dying in prolonged and excruciating pain. I am certain, however, that it would be a comfort to be able to consider the options afforded by this bill.”

Right-to-die supporters have been working to legalize the practice in California for almost two decades. The movement gained significant momentum last year when Brittany Maynard, a 29-year-old newlywed, was diagnosed with terminal brain cancer and left California for Oregon to take advantage of the state’s Death With Dignity law, which went into effect in 1997. Since Maynard’s death, half of all U.S. states have introduced aid-in-dying legislation.

“This is the biggest victory for the death-with-dignity movement since Oregon passed the nation’s first law two decades ago,” said Barbara Coombs Lee, president of Compassion & Choices, a right-to-die advocacy group, in a statement.

Polls showed that three-fourths of Californians supported the measure, but legislators routinely ran into opposition from disability rights advocates who say the practice can open the door to abuses of the elderly and disabled, as well as the Catholic Church, which says only God should decide when people should die.

The law allows doctors to prescribe life-ending medication to patients who have been given six months or less to live. It requires two doctors to consent to the prescription as well as written requests from the patient for the medication. California joins Oregon, Washington, Vermont and Montana, which also allow the practice.

Complete Article HERE!