Category: Assisted Dying

Posted on

Patients limited from accessing Voluntary Assisted Dying at some hospitals and palliative care units

Miki says she and her mother felt they had to choose between getting the best possible care or the best possible death.

By Annika Blau

It’s July 2021, and Miki is begging for help.

Her mum is trying to ask her doctor something, but in recent weeks, she’s lost the ability to speak.

Miki’s mum has motor neurone disease (MND) and her only means of communicating is with a letter board, where she blinks to spell out what she’s trying to say.

She needs staff from her hospital to operate the equipment, but they’re refusing to be involved.

“It really sent a … message that what we were doing was wrong,” Miki says.

Eventually, Miki’s begging reaches the hospital CEO, who grants special permission for an occupational therapist to set up the letter board.

“There were rules that [the occupational therapist] could set my mum up with the equipment, but they were not to be present in the room for any conversations,” Miki says.

And then, letter by letter, Miki’s mum blinks to spell out her request: She wants to die.

Voluntary assisted dying (VAD) has been legal in Victoria since 2019, meaning people like Miki’s mum who are suffering from a degenerative condition can choose to take certain medication to end their life.

But healthcare providers can refuse to facilitate VAD if they object to it on ethical grounds.

This is the situation Miki and her mother found themselves in.

“I was really shocked to learn that a publicly funded hospital could have policies that existed on ideological or religious grounds,” Miki says.

“Someone like my mum, who can’t talk, can’t move, can’t advocate for themselves… is facing just about as many barriers as a person can face. So every little hurdle that’s added to that is just an enormous stress to overcome.”

‘Forbidden to raise the topic’

At her home in the west of Melbourne, Miki stops in the hallway and gazes into a bedroom.

It’s stacked floor to ceiling with boxes — her mum’s entire life — but Miki can’t bear to face it just yet.

Her mum was a dance teacher and later a librarian, but when she started having falls in 2019, she was diagnosed with MND.

A photograph of a woman with dark hair sits beside an open jewellery box containing a pearl necklace.
Miki’s mother was a dance teacher and later worked as a librarian. 

Miki’s mum was living in South Australia at the time, but they were told one of the best places to get care for MND was in Melbourne, at Calvary Bethlehem Hospital.

“We also knew she’d be able to access VAD in Victoria, which she couldn’t in South Australia, so we moved her over,” Miki says.

What they didn’t realise was that Calvary Bethlehem is one of 21 public Catholic hospitals around Australia with a blanket policy against VAD.

Miki noticed right from the first appointment “an undercurrent of nervousness in everyone we spoke to at Calvary Bethlehem — if you mentioned VAD, it was like hitting a brick wall.”

But they didn’t know where else to turn. To Miki, switching hospitals felt like choosing between the best possible care, and the best possible death.

“As we understood it, Calvary Bethlehem was the place that people with MND go. It was never discussed with us that there was an alternative that might be better able to support my mum’s desire to apply for VAD,” Miki says.

A woman gazes into a room stacked high with moving boxes.
Miki had her mum’s possessions remotely packed and moved from South Australia during the pandemic. By the time her mother was ready to apply for VAD, they were both exhausted.

One doctor, speaking on the condition of anonymity, told Background Briefing that referring doctors can’t warn their patients about Calvary Bethlehem’s stance, because raising VAD with a patient is illegal.

Doctors can only answer questions about VAD if the patient raises it first, and many have not yet considered it when they’re first diagnosed and choosing a hospital.

“Patients who are inadvertently admitted to Catholic hospitals may never learn of their rights and as doctors we are not allowed to educate them — the questions must come from them,” the doctor said.

“I am forbidden by law to raise the topic. Therein lies a massive problem.”

The doctor said they’d had to remove patients from Calvary Bethlehem’s “superb service” due to its refusal to be involved in VAD.

In a statement, Calvary Bethlehem confirmed the team caring for Miki’s mother were following its policy of not being involved with VAD.

It said it responds “openly, sensitively and respectfully to anyone expressing a wish to explore VAD” and “would not block a person’s access”.

Miki's mum's necklace
Miki says her mum’s decline was “swift and devastating”. “On the one side of [Melbourne’s] lockdown she could hug me and on the other she couldn’t.”

Personal views influencing policy

Objection to VAD is also prevalent in the palliative care sector, where Catholic-run organisations are major players.

But objection is not limited to faith-based organisations — many secular public facilities also refuse to be involved.

QUT Professor of end of life law and regulation, Ben White, says the policy for entire institutions is often influenced by the views of individuals in leadership positions.

Professor White interviewed dozens of families in Victoria about accessing VAD.

He says the majority described objection by healthcare facilities, with their loved ones blocked from having VAD doctors or pharmacists visit, or prohibited from taking the medication on site.

Objection was particularly problematic for regional families he interviewed, who “didn’t have the ability to just go to the next institution down the road,” he says.

A man wearing a suit and tie and glasses stands smiling in front of a shelf full of books.
QUT Professor of end of life law and regulation Ben White.

‘He scolded me’

Like Miki, Julius Pieker had to watch his mother decline during the pandemic.

She had ovarian cancer, and after a bad fall, was sent to Wantirna Palliative Care Unit — a secular public facility servicing Melbourne’s eastern suburbs.

During her stay, she summoned Julius to her bedside and told him she wanted to use VAD. Under the legislation, this is available to anyone expected to die within six months.

“I said to her, look, we’ll support you in whatever you want to do,” he says.

Julius looked around the facility for someone to tell, and spied his mother’s doctor.

But the doctor’s reaction floored Julius.

“He scolded me. And tried to say that I was not to encourage my mum to do this,” Julius says.

“I was distressed by him making that sort of accusation that I would do that, and I told him so.”

Julius says the doctor was silent.

“He didn’t try to console me or say, you know, ‘I didn’t mean to give you the wrong impression’. He was just like stone,” he says.

Legally, there’s no obligation for objecting doctors to refer people like Julius on to a service that might be able to provide more information.

“I was left feeling that I had nowhere to go after I spoke to that one person,” Julius says.

What Julius didn’t realise was that until recently, Wantirna had been transferring patients who requested VAD out of this public facility.

“I didn’t know about the politics of palliative care,” Julius says.

“They have no right to stop people from accessing [VAD], because it’s legal.”

Julius’s mum was transferred back to the public hospital she’d initially come from, where she was able to access the VAD medication to end her life.

Melbourne oncologist, Prasad Cooray, says the transferring of patients out of Wantirna has been an “ongoing problem” for him and his colleagues.

In some instances, patients have been transferred upon requesting a VAD permit — before they even decide whether to go ahead with using the medication.

“[Transferring patients] takes away dignity and adds unnecessary distress to these last moments of their lives,” Dr Cooray says.

A man wearing a light grey jacket sits side on on a stool smiling at the camera with a dark grey backdrop behind
Melbourne oncologist Prasad Cooray says the transferring of patients has been an ‘ongoing problem’.

His biggest fear has been that one of his patients could die in the back of an ambulance during a transfer — “a dying patient is dying, unstable,” he says.

Patients can also be distraught on having to move facilities, and feel chastised, he says.

“It’s a judgement that’s passed upon you. How terrible is that — that we are passing a judgement on the dying patient in a place where we need to be infusing humanity and love?”

The other public palliative care centre in Dr Cooray’s catchment is Caritas Christi, a Catholic organisation with limitations around VAD.

The main option left for patients wanting VAD has been the acute medical wards of local hospitals, which Dr Cooray says are “one step down from an emergency department” and “not designed for dying”.

“Palliative care places are … a much more peaceful environment, as homely as you can make it,” Dr Cooray says.

“These institutions exist for the benefit and for serving the patients.

“And I do not understand how it’s been flipped around that it exists to serve the conscientious objections of staff. Those people should … step aside and allow people who do not have objections to carry it out in that place.”

In other instances, patients had been transferred home, where families often felt ill-equipped to provide 24/7 care for their dying loved one.

Dr Cooray said the local health authority, Eastern Health, had been long aware of the situation at its Wantirna Palliative Care Unit.

But last year, Victoria’s VAD Board got involved after a complaint from a patient’s family.

Eastern Health then changed its guidelines to mandate that VAD be accessible at all its sites, and in recent months, Wantirna stopped transferring patients seeking VAD.

Complete Article ↪HERE↩!

Posted on

I understand why people are wary about assisted dying

— But it gave my mother a dignified end

Protesters gather in London to call for a change in the law to support assisted dying.

The Dutch legalisation spared her further misery. We don’t take euthanasia lightly; we’re just grateful to have the option

By

My mother, Jannèt, was 90 years old when she ended her life by means of euthanasia. For years she had been suffering from numerous serious and painful conditions that made her life miserable. She always worried about her health and was terrified of what the future undeniably held in store for her: more pain, more dependence on others, more suffering, more desperation.

On 20 June 2022 at 2pm she was visited by a doctor and a nurse. They had a last conversation with her, during which the doctor asked her if euthanasia was still what she wanted. My mother said yes. She had already decided that she would take the drink herself instead of being injected. She didn’t want to mentally burden the doctor more than necessary.

I was impressed by my mother’s courage in the face of death. She was completely calm, almost cheerful. Before the procedure started, she spoke briefly to us, her three daughters. She told us how it was important to take care of the Earth wisely, to recycle as much as possible and to look after one another. She then drank the small cup in one gulp. She fell asleep very quickly and 15 minutes later the doctor told us her heart had stopped beating. A long and tormented life had come to an end.

The country in which I live, the Netherlands, was the first in the world to legalise euthanasia in specific cases. That was in 2001. Assisted dying has become generally accepted in our country. We talk about it openly and we consider the possibility when situations call for it. We are grateful that this option exists, because it prevents so much pointless suffering. But we never talk about it lightly. Assisted dying has always remained something huge, something you don’t resort to lightheartedly.

Renate van der Zee’s mother Jannèt
‘I was impressed by my mother’s courage in the face of death.’ Renate van der Zee’s mother Jannèt

As a matter of fact, you can’t. In the Netherlands it will always remain a criminal offence to end a life. Exceptions are made only when a whole range of requirements are met. First of all, the patient must ask for it themselves and must therefore be mentally capable of asking for it. In addition, there are all kinds of due care requirements. For example, the doctor must be convinced that the request for assisted dying is voluntary and that the patient has carefully thought it through. The doctor must also be convinced that the patient’s suffering is hopeless and unbearable. That they can no longer heal, that it is not possible to alleviate their suffering and that there is no reasonable other solution. At least one other independent doctor must be consulted. That independent doctor will discuss the situation with the patient and form his or her own opinion about the situation.

Assisted dying is allowed only if a person is suffering owing to a medical cause, not if someone is simply tired of life or feels that their life is complete. My mother didn’t feel that her life was complete. There were still things that made her happy. She loved flowers and plants; she loved politics; she followed the news. But because of her deafness, incontinence and many other conditions she became socially isolated. Visits from friends became too much for her, and at a certain point even phone calls became impossible.

Walking became very difficult, and she grew afraid to go outside. She always loved to wander through a neighbourhood park, especially in springtime, when the bluebells and lilies of the valley bloomed abundantly. But she was no longer able to go there, not even in a wheelchair. She always enjoyed reading and watching nature programmes, but those things too became increasingly difficult. Her numerous ailments and her lack of mental resilience to deal with them made a normal daily existence impossible. And there was no prospect of improvement.

My mother’s euthanasia was a long process. Five years before her death, she told her GP that assisted dying was what she wanted if her life became unbearable. Over the years, my older sister discussed this wish with her during long conversations. She also took charge of all the conversations that were necessary before permission was finally given.

My mother wanted to celebrate her 90th birthday before she took leave of life. Her last birthday fell on Easter, which she regarded as meaningful. But what kind of birthday gift can you give to someone who will soon be gone? My older sister came up with the idea of making a book in which all her loved ones wrote down what she meant to them, or reminisced. She was very happy with that.

We sat close to her when she died. My younger sister took my mother’s hand and she held it tightly. The older sibling said in a soft voice, “You can close your eyes now, Mum.” That’s what my mother did. I sat there and tried not to cry. It’s not easy to witness your mother drinking a deadly potion and dying after 15 minutes.

The next day was the first day of summer. The sun was shining, the weather was beautiful. I woke up with the pain that my mother was gone. But also with a feeling of relief and deep gratitude that, after such an incredibly difficult life, she had been granted a painless and dignified death. I knew we had given her a great gift.

Complete Article ↪HERE↩!

Posted on

All pets go to heaven.

— She helps them do it at home.

Eden Gaines, left, talks with veterinarian Karen Meyers about the decision to euthanize Xochitl, a boxer-Great Dane mix who has cancer.

By

Veterinarian Karen Meyers pulls her black minivan into the driveway of a townhouse in Maryland’s National Harbor. The home, in a gated community, is perched on a windy bluff not far from restaurants, bars, a casino — places of revelry.

The vet carries her brown doctor’s bag inside. There, she meets her patient: Xochitl, known as Xochi, an 11-year-old boxer-Great Dane mix weighing around 80 pounds.

Xochi, recently diagnosed with cancer, is struggling. A film covers her right eye. She had been bleeding from her mouth, refusing to eat. Now she stands in the townhouse’s living room, mournfully greeting family members who have come to say goodbye.

Xochi climbs onto the living room’s leather couch and lies down. Owner Eden Gaines and her family gather around her. Meyers opens her bag.

Meyers explains the procedure. First, Xochi will be injected with a sedative to make her fall asleep. Five to 10 minutes later, Meyers will administer sodium pentobarbital, which will euthanize her. But Xochi would feel no pain, Meyers assures the family.

She asks whether anyone has any questions.

No one does.

“Here we go,” she says.

Meyers says she has euthanized 1,500 animals in four years.

Pet adoption spiked during the pandemic, with nearly 1 in 5 American households taking animals in and spending far more on them than pet owners did decades ago. With more beasts in our lives — as companions, as emotional support animals, as the beneficiaries of pet trusts — it only makes sense that their owners want their final moments in their lives to be as peaceful and painless as possible.

That’s where Meyers comes in. Working with Lap of Love, a company that provides veterinarian referrals for at-home pet euthanasia, she travels from house to house in the D.C. region offering grieving families’ animals what the word euthanasia means: “good death.” In four years, she has euthanized 1,500 animals: cats, dogs, rabbits, rats. Some had been with their owners since childhood. Some had traveled the world with them. Some were their owner’s sole companion.

Meyers has observed death rituals that include praying, burning incense, wrapping a deceased pet’s body in a white sheet, and opening a window for a pet’s spirit to exit. She has listened to owners read poems or letters to their pets and cried along with them.

“When people hear what I do for living, it sounds sad,” Meyers says. “But it’s strangely rewarding. … You give pets a peaceful experience. It’s a final gift.”< Meyers has been surrounded by a menagerie all her life. Growing up, she usually had a dog and one or two cats; at various times, she’s also had two hamsters, two turtles, a guinea pig, a bird and four chickens. Right now, she has Wren, a 6-year-old Cavalier King Charles spaniel; Travis, a 3-year-old pug; Brinkley, a 13-year-old rat terrier Chihuahua; and Pablo, a red-belly parrot. Right before the pandemic, Meyers decided to shift to doing euthanasia full time. She had been a veterinarian for more than two decades, and pet euthanasia turned out to be less stressful than working in an office while raising two children. In-home euthanasia can be easier on animals and their owners than office appointments with other sick animals and their distressed owners crowded around.

The first injection makes Xochi fall asleep.
Rameses Gaines holds a piece of Xochi’s fur.

Meyers administers the first shot in Xochi’s back. The dog, already lying down with her head on Gaines’s lap, turns to glance at Meyers as if mildly annoyed.

Then, the dog relaxes.

Minutes pass.

Using a hair clipper, Meyers shaves an inch-long strip of one of Xochi’s legs and inserts a small IV line. After confirming that the family wants to continue, Meyers administers the second shot, the one with the fatal dose.

Gaines looks at the spot on Xochi’s leg where the IV had been inserted.

“It’s amazing how gray she became,” Gaines says.

Meyers holds a stethoscope to Xochi’s chest. “Xochi has her wings,” she says.

The family cries.

So does Meyers.

She and Gaines embrace.

Meyers maneuvers Xochi onto a stretcher and covers her with a blanket. With the help of Gaines’s sons, she loads the dog into her car. Eventually Xochi will be cremated and her ashes returned to the Gaines family.

Death is a part of life, Meyers says.

“Many times, people will comment how a human family member passed, and it was so painful at the end, and this is peaceful by contrast,” she says.

They tell her, she says, that they wish they could go the same way.

Rameses Gaines touches a mold of Xochi’s paw print.

Complete Article ↪HERE↩!

Posted on

Irish committee to recommend laws for assisted dying

— Proposed legislation would allow people help with ending their lives under certain medical conditions

The legislation would require two doctors to sign off on a person’s incurable and life-threatening condition.

By

An all-party parliamentary committee in Ireland is to recommend that legislation be introduced to allow for assisted dying if a person has a terminal illness or has only a short time to live.

A majority on the Oireachtas committee on assisted dying supported the proposal that the law be changed to allow someone to get assistance to end their life if they have between six and 12 months to live.

The legislation would apply to people who have been diagnosed with an illness or a medical condition that is “incurable, irreversible, progressive” and at an advanced stage that will cause death within six months.

It is expected that the time limit for those with a neurodegenerative condition would be extended to 12 months.

The committee’s report is to be published on 20 March but has now been agreed by a majority of representatives from all sides of the Irish parliament. After its publication it will go to government for further consideration.

It is unclear whether the three-party coalition government led by Leo Varadkar is prepared to introduce legislation to enact the recommendation before a general election expected this autumn.

If it does, Ireland will join other countries including Switzerland, Belgium, Canada and the Netherlands in allowing assisted dying under certain circumstances.

It is understood that the proposed Irish legislation would require two doctors to sign off on a person’s incurable and life-threatening condition.

At hearings representatives of the Christian churches and a Muslim cleric voiced their opposition to the legislation, saying it was morally wrong to kill someone and was against God’s will.

Some psychiatrists also argued it could lead to “a slippery slope” with increasing numbers seeking to end their lives.

But the committee’s recommendation has been welcomed by the chair of the advocacy group End of Life Ireland.

Janie Lazar said: “We’ve been working hard to get people talking about assisted dying and about the choices that should be available to those who have no time to wait or waste.”

Constitutional law experts say they are confident that the committee’s recommendation would not require a referendum but a simple law change.

Nathan Stilwell, assisted dying campaigner for Humanists UK, welcomed the “bold move”, comparing it favourably with the debate in Britain where a report by MPs last month did not recommend a vote on the issue.

“Well done to the Irish special Oireachtas committee on assisted dying for taking an evidence-based and compassionate approach. It’s brilliant to see such a bold move after just a week ago a Westminster committee did not vote for any change in the law,” said Stilwell.

Complete Article ↪HERE↩!

Posted on

A cancer patient had decided how to die.

— Here’s what I learned from her.

For those with a terminal diagnosis, it’s getting easier to control death, but the process remains complex

By

I first learned about “medical aid in dying” last spring when my sister, Julie, who suffered from advanced ovarian cancer, chose to end her life — in accordance with New Jersey law — after all realistic treatments had been exhausted and the pain medicines prescribed could no longer alleviate her suffering. At that time I didn’t know anyone else who had taken this step. While Julie’s hospice social worker provided answers to our questions, there was much I didn’t know about medical aid in dying at the time she died at age 61, much that I wish I’d understood better.

After Julie’s death, Lynda Shannon Bluestein, 76, became one of my teachers. The married mother of two also suffered from late-stage ovarian — and fallopian — cancer.

In a series of conversations last fall Bluestein told me she had wanted to plan for medical aid in dying when her condition worsened, but medical aid in dying, or MAID, is not legal in her home state of Connecticut. However, it was legal in nearby Vermont, but barred to nonresidents. Last year Bluestein sued the state to eliminate the residency requirement, which put her on front pages throughout New England.

Last March, when her chemotherapy regimen become too much to bear, she stopped treatment and began hospice care. By May she’d won her court case and the right to utilize Vermont’s medical aid in dying procedures

Like others who want to use life-ending medications, Bluestein had to follow a carefully prescribed process, which begins with a terminal diagnosis. Following Vermont’s MAID law, known as Act 39, Bluestein made two verbal requests to her attending doctor, at least 15 days apart, then made a written request signed by two witnesses who were 18 or older.

As she told me, “My two witnesses had no interest in my estate and no influence on my life [and] they weren’t related to me in any way.” (This ended up later sparking a journalism controversy when it turned out one of the witnesses was a columnist from the Boston Globe, who had been writing about Bluestein.) As a final step, a second physician reconfirmed that she met all the qualifying criteria.

By October, when we first spoke, Bluestein had met all the requirements. And so Diana Barnard, a Vermont family medicine doctor who is board certified in hospice and palliative care, called in the prescription for the mix of sedatives and barbiturates to the one pharmacy in the state that dispenses them. They would be held there until Bluestein needed them and would cost her $700 out of pocket, since Medicare, her insurance provider, does not provide coverage.

I spoke with Barnard about what happens during the procedure. “It’s harder to hasten a death than you might imagine,” she said. Five powerful medications are currently used, including diazepam, digoxin, morphine sulfate, amitriptyline, and phenobarbital. Death usually comes within 90 to 120 minutes but can take longer, she explained.

Bluestein completely understood what would happen after she swallowed the lethal mix of medicines. When we last spoke by phone, she told me she worried that if she waited too long, she’d be unable to ingest the drugs or would throw them up. When it became clear over the year end holidays that her health was deteriorating rapidly, she chose her date.

On Jan. 3, she and husband, Paul, drove to a private hospice facility that provides “a safe and caring space” for patients to end their lives.

Barnard explained that when a patient is ready to take the meds, they, a relative or friend would mix the drugs with water or apple juice. It’s crucial to imbibe the entire potion within two minutes for the greatest efficacy, said Barnard. Within a couple of minutes, patients lose consciousness, she said, and “appear to be unaware and not experiencing external stimuli,” with just the heart and lungs still working. Then comes the waiting for the end.

The 2022 Oregon Death With Dignity annual summary reported rare complications such as difficulty swallowing and regurgitation, but Barnard said there are precautions that can prevent most of them. (Oregon is one of 10 states plus the District of Columbia that now allow MAID.)

For instance, Barnard makes sure her patients can swallow effectively and can drink the whole mixture at once (some people practice with a placebo or view a video enactment of how to take these drugs at bedside).

On the morning of Jan. 4, now in Vermont, Bluestein and her husband Paul got up early, he said, and after the rest of the family arrived, he gave her the premedication (which makes the patient calm and drowsy, though not too drowsy to take the next step). After 30 minutes, the hospice owner came in to mix up the life-ending cocktail. He asked her if she was ready, and according to Paul she replied, “I’m so happy I don’t have to suffer anymore.” She drank it all — quickly.

Bluestein was unconscious within five minutes, her husband said. “She looked like she had fallen asleep peacefully. … A lot of the pain that was in her face went away, and I was grateful.” She was pronounced dead by a hospice nurse after just 25 minutes.

A few weeks after Bluestein’s death, I asked Paul Bluestein about the pain she had endured. He replied in a text: “There are some things in life no one should have to see and one of them is watching someone you love in pain.” It was “intolerable” and “undescribable.”

During my last phone call with Bluestein, she made a point to say that making her plan “was extraordinarily difficult. You really have to want to do this a lot, have a fair amount of money, a lot of flexibility, and be very well connected to accomplish this.”

I understood exactly what she meant, as the same had been true for my sister, who, while suffering, had to arrange this last medical procedure.

For critics who fear that MAID could make it too easy for someone to take their own life, or to pressure someone else to take theirs, I offer Bluestein’s words, along with my sister’s experience.

It’s not an easy process, and requires deliberation and intent, and the sign-off from others. But it offers an end to much pain and suffering, and that is a gift to those like my sister and Lynda Bluestein.

Complete Article ↪HERE↩!

Posted on

Woman found father dead after he took assisted dying drugs meant for someone else, Queensland inquest hears

— Man aged in his 80s kept the substance in his home after it was no longer required for another person, coroner told

A man who took a voluntary assisted dying substance intended for someone else was found dead at home by his adult daughter, an inquest has heard.

“I thought he was asleep in the chair. I put my arms around him. He was cold,” the woman said.

The coroner’s court in Brisbane on Tuesday opened the inquest into the May 2023 death of a man aged in his 80s referred to by the pseudonym ABC.

ABC’s name and those of his family members along with many other details surrounding his death cannot be published for legal reasons.

The substance involved in ABC’s death was obtained legally after Queensland allowed voluntary assisted dying (VAD) in January 2023.

Under that law, a person can self-administer a VAD substance in a private location but they must nominate a person who will be legally required to return any unused or leftover portion within 14 days.

Coroner David O’Connell heard ABC kept the VAD substance in his home after it was no longer required for another person.

ABC’s daughter said she held his hand and shook him after returning from running errands to find the house locked up with the blinds drawn.

Becoming tearful and with her voice breaking with emotion at times, the woman said her husband told her there was an open box on the kitchen table.

“I knew immediately it was the VAD,” she said.

O’Connell asked the woman if anyone had thought to have a medical professional collect the VAD substance as ABC was temporarily unable to leave his home.

“In hindsight, I didn’t even think to ask,” the woman said.

Queensland Health’s VAD staff were aware that the substance was due to be returned and ABC had said he would do so when he picked up his other medication.

A registered nurse involved in VAD told the inquest that there had been one patient where the substance was not kept in their home.

“It was share accommodation … the man chose not to have it in the house as it was unsafe. It was taken to the local hospital,” the nurse said.

The nurse said she would also not allow the substance to be stored in a home if she herself felt it to be unsafe.

O’Connell said he was concerned that regulations around self-administering VAD could allow other people without a terminal illness to be physically harmed or suffer mental distress.

“We’ve got medication safety and patient autonomy; we’ve got to find where the pendulum swings to get the balance right,” he said.

The nurse said VAD substances in a hospital were kept in a locked cabinet that required two keys to access but were not monitored after a patient took possession.

Barrister for Queensland Health, April Freeman, asked the nurse if some cancer patients were given pain medication in potentially fatal amounts.

The nurse said it was not uncommon and she was not aware of health authorities having control over those drugs once they were handed to patients.

Complete Article ↪HERE↩!

Posted on

‘Duo euthanasia’

— In the Netherlands, a famous couple chooses to die together

Former Dutch prime minister Dries van Agt and his wife, Eugenie, in Den Bosch, the Netherlands, in June 1983.

By

The vow is “til death do us part.” But for former Dutch prime minister Dries van Agt and his wife, Eugenie, the aim was to leave this life the same way they had spent the past seven decades — together.

The couple, both 93, died “hand in hand” earlier this month, according to a statement from the Rights Forum, a pro-Palestinian organization that Dries van Agt created. They chose to die by what is known as “duo euthanasia” — a growing trend in the Netherlands, where a small number of couples have been granted their wish to die in unison in recent years, usually by a lethal dose of a drug.

A longtime politician who had conservative roots but campaigned for numerous liberal causes, van Agt served as prime minister of the Netherlands from 1977 to 1982. He later became the European Union’s ambassador to Japan and the United States

Photos of the couple from their decades-long careers as public figures often show them walking in step: waving to crowds through a car window, voting together at an election site and giving each other a smooch at a public event.

The van Agts’ health had declined in recent years, Dutch public broadcaster NOS reported. The former prime minister never fully recovered after suffering a brain hemorrhage in 2019, which happened while he was delivering a speech at a commemoration event for Palestinians. Eugenie’s health issues were largely kept private.

“I feel like it’s kind of beautiful, honestly, that you’ve lived your life together, you both happen to be gravely ill without a chance of getting better, you’re ready to go, and you would like to go together,” said Maria Carpiac, director of the gerontology program at California State University at Long Beach.

When it comes to the right to choose one’s own death, the Netherlands is “kind of the model” for any U.S. legislation on the topic, she said.

At least 29 couples — or 58 people — died together via duo euthanasia in 2022, the most recent year of data from the country’s Regional Euthanasia Review Committees. That’s more than double the 13 couples who did so in 2020, when the committee first started looking at partners specifically, but it still represents only a small fraction of the 8,720 people who legally died by euthanasia or assisted suicide in the Netherlands that year.

“It is likely that this will happen more and more often,” said Rob Edens, press officer for NVVE, a Dutch organization focused on research, lobbying and education about assisted suicide and euthanasia in the Netherlands. “We still see a reluctance among doctors to provide euthanasia based on an accumulation of age-related conditions. But it is permitted” in the country’s legal guidelines, he said in an email.

Assisted suicide is when a person self-administers a lethal dose while a physician is present, while euthanasia is when a medical professional administers the dose. Both are legal in the Netherlands when specific criteria are met. (Some groups prefer the term “medical aid in dying,” or MAID, due to religious and social stigma around suicide.)

Euthanasia is illegal in the United States, but assisted suicide is allowed in D.C. and at least 10 states: Oregon, Washington, Montana, Vermont, California, Colorado, Hawaii, New Jersey, Maine and New Mexico. Eligibility requirements tend to be strict across the country, Carpiac said, but there are differences between jurisdictions.

The Netherlands, a country of almost 18 million people, has allowed assisted suicide and euthanasia since 2002. It requires that individuals willingly request the termination of their life in a manner that is “well-considered,” with a sign-off from a doctor that they are experiencing “unbearable suffering with no prospect of improvement.”

Another physician then has to agree that the person qualifies, and doctors can choose whether they are involved in the procedure. After every death, doctors are required to notify a regional review committee, which examines whether each case was handled lawfully. Couples who seek duo euthanasia are required to apply and undergo the review process individually, with separate doctors.

“An accumulation of age-related complaints can lead to unbearable and hopeless suffering,” Edens said, explaining the Dutch guidelines. “The expectation is that if doctors are increasingly willing to provide euthanasia when there is an accumulation of old-age complaints, the number of duo euthanasia [cases] will increase.”

Research suggests that older Americans are at a higher risk of dying after losing a spouse, particularly in the first few months after their death. While the cause of this phenomenon is unclear, studies have found that grieving partners have higher rates of inflammation and are at increased risk of heart attack and stroke, often due to stress-induced changes in blood pressure, heart rate and blood clotting.

“The first thing that came to my mind was the widowhood effect,” Carpiac said, referring to the van Agts’ choice to die by duo euthanasia. “I have a grandmother who is 96, and she’s like, ‘I’m not going anywhere!’ But if I had a partner and they were my person, and we were both kind of at the end of our lives, would it be worth it if he were to go without me? Would I die of what I considered to be a broken heart? I would want to have a choice.”

Complete Article ↪HERE↩!